Community Survey Summer 2007
Pucklechurch, Shortwood, Parkfield, Lyde Green
community website

Q13) How would you feel about further development of Pucklechurch Trading Estate?
Other text if needed

Y) Answered (at least 1 tick)
Other text if needed

Overall responses
Q13 responses as %s of the 1273 Individual questionnaires returned:
41.9% Do not want it
38.9% Would support upgrading and improvements
22.5% Would support limited new development for commercial use
3.5% Would support substantial development for commercial use
10.6% Would support development of residential property
11.9% No opinion
3% Did not answer
97% ANSWERED (AT LEAST 1 TICK) (represented by the shade of colour)

is repesented by this colour.

info
Community Survey Summer 2007
Pucklechurch - Shortwood - Parkfield - Lyde Green
This survey formed an important part of the research in the development of the Community Plan for the parish of Pucklechurch. Anonymity of respondents was preserved by not recording names or addresses and not recording the link between the Individual and Household questionnaires collected from any household. Nevertheless to allow some geographical analysis the 'Rounds' in which questionnaires were delivered and collected were recorded. The Rounds are shown here in Google Earth coloured to allow comparison between them in responses to the selected survey question. A colour key is shown on the right.
TIPS
In the sidebar tick items to display - e.g. Under 'Layers' tick 'Roads' to help to identify the area. (If the sidebar is not displayed: tick 'Sidebar' in the View menu.)
Drag the view and zoom in until the area of the Round to be inspected is larger than the arrow cursor.
Click in the middle of the Round to display a summary of the responses from that Round. If the Round is displayed too small or if you click too close to a neighbouring Round you may be misled by displaying the results for the wrong Round even though the balloon points to where you clicked!
Click the 'Overall responses' roundel to see results for the question overall Rounds in the survey.
If the outlines of the Rounds are displayed without any fill colour take notice of the message boxes displayed whilst Google Earth is loading: it may be that your graphics card does not support the clamped polygons feature used to display the Rounds coloured.
If you find the cursor does not change from a hand to an arrow as you move it over the Rounds you may need to update to a newer version of Google Earth (See Help menu 'Check for updates...').
The position of the colour key text is a little unruly. Click a colour key roundel to confirm what its colour represents.
Optimise settings under the Tools menu 'Options...': e.g. Under the 'Navigation' tab adjust the 'Fly-To speed' or untick/tick 'Automatically tilt while zooming'. Under the 'General' tab untick/tick 'Show start up tips'.
On exiting DO NOT save to your 'My Places' folder when prompted as the colours displayed for other questions in subsequent .KML file links to Google Earth will NOT be correct.
If previously viewed coloured Rounds have been saved: 'Community Survey Summer 2007' in the sidebar under 'Places' 'My Places'(like other items) may be hidden by unticking it or right click and Delete it there.
For more information see Google Earth Help and the Pucklechurch community website
(ref. ptl/Questionnaires v3.30 MASTER.mdb)

Round 1
Q13 responses as %s of the 45 Individual questionnaires returned:
37.8% Do not want it
46.7% Would support upgrading and improvements
17.8% Would support limited new development for commercial use
0% Would support substantial development for commercial use
13.3% Would support development of residential property
13.3% No opinion
0% Did not answer
100% ANSWERED (AT LEAST 1 TICK) (represented by the shade of colour)

Round 2
Q13 responses as %s of the 24 Individual questionnaires returned:
37.5% Do not want it
50% Would support upgrading and improvements
41.7% Would support limited new development for commercial use
8.3% Would support substantial development for commercial use
12.5% Would support development of residential property
4.2% No opinion
0% Did not answer
100% ANSWERED (AT LEAST 1 TICK) (represented by the shade of colour)

Round 3
40% Do not want it
60% Would support upgrading and improvements
6.7% Would support substantial development for commercial use
6.7% Did not answer
93.3% ANSWERED (AT LEAST 1 TICK) (represented by the shade of colour)

61.1% Would support upgrading and improvements
5.6% Did not answer
94.4% ANSWERED (AT LEAST 1 TICK) (represented by the shade of colour)

0% Would support substantial development for commercial use

5.3% Did not answer
94.7% ANSWERED (AT LEAST 1 TICK) (represented by the shade of colour)

50% Would support upgrading and improvements
0% No opinion

0% Would support limited new development for commercial use
25% No opinion

25% Do not want it

24% Do not want it
20% Would support limited new development for commercial use
16% Would support development of residential property
16% No opinion

Round 20.1
5% Would support limited new development for commercial use

Round 20.2
0% Would support development of residential property

Round 21.1 in 3 parts
0% Would support development of residential property

Round 21.2

No questionnaires returned