|
Name of author |
Summary |
Link |
|
Jacki Berry |
Feasibility study did not consider public transport as an option. Road building does not address congestion and other issues in the longer term. Community Plan and Neighbourhood plans show community places high value on Green Belt. Green belt is precious. |
|
|
Leigh Melvin |
This letter takes each objective and argues that there are better options than a new junction and there will be significant impacts not identified in the consultation. For example, improving the M32J1 and MwJ19 to a free flow intersection, better (and free buses) and much more. |
|
|
H. Harrop |
Another good letter that takes a different approach by highlighting the statements in the The South Gloucestershire local plan core strategy document- |
|
|
Dr & Mrs R Palmer |
This objection letter brings in the issues that stopped a junction being built in 1999 and points out no new evidence has been provided. It is also has a good summary of topic areas for objection letters |
|
|
Rick Dunning |
A powerfully moving and poignant objection letter that contrasts the West of England combined authorities' vision and how the J18a proposal run directly counter to this - |
|
|
Pucklechurch Parish Council |
A detailed analysis of the consultation documents and process with the main objections being: • The consultation process and its failure to provide appropriate detailed and accurate information on which anyone can make a well- • The efficacy of providing a junction at all in light of the fact that no alternative options have been explored against which the proposed options can be tested • Evidence that demonstrates why neither of the two eastern options are appropriate |
|
|
Martin Smith |
The focus is on the evidence that a new J18a will not solve the traffic issues and there are better ways to achieve the consultation objectives. |
|
|
Malcolm Greenaway |
Covers the main areas of objection - |